![]() | ||
|
|
FMF vs COMNEBOL: MLS and CONCACAF to the Rescue?
………Click Here for Original Article
Atlante’s victory in the CONCACAF Champions League and the start of the
playoffs should have been the biggest stories of the last week in Mexican
Football. But sadly they were not because of the discrimination Mexican
clubs faced in the knock out stages of the Copa Libertadoras, eventually
being forced to withdraw from the tournament. The issue was supposedly the
Swine Flu, but perhaps it really was the reluctance of South American sides
to face off with teams from outside their Confederation whose league is one
of the best on the planet.
Both San Luis and Chivas had done a credible job to reach the knock out
stages but COMENBOL very unprofessionally allowed its member nations to
justify the use of paranoia when refusing to host Mexican teams. Given that
Mexico is not a member of COMENBOL but has the richest domestic league in
the Americas and thus bought its way into South American club competitions
it comes as no surprise that the member nations of the Confederation used
the opportunity to make the FMF feel unwelcome.
Thanks to this action, Mexico has withdrawn from all COMNEBOL competitions.
Theoretically if the FMF keeps its word that means no Copa America for El
Tri in 2011. Mexico is the only nation to have advanced out of the group
stage of every Copa America since 1993. This also means no Mexican teams in
the upcoming Copa Sudamericana which Pachuca won in 2005.
Atlante has qualified for the World Club Championship with its CONCACAF CL
triumph. Justice would be served in my humble opinion if Atlanta faced the
Copa Lib. champions in Dubai and beat them.
But in the meantime CONCACAF and MLS both have big opportunities with the
decision of Mexico to withdraw from South American competitions. CONCACAF’s
Champions League has to be considered a bit of a joke for allowing as many
MLS teams directly into the qualifying round as FMF sides, considering no
MLS team has made a CONCACAF final since 20o0 and no CONCACAF final has been
staged without an FMF representative since that same year.
CONCACAF should take two spots away from MLS for the 2009-2010 Champions
League, awarding one to the Interliga winner (a competition staged by
MLS/SUM) and the other to the winner of Superliga which could be an MLS
side. This could bring as many as six FMF teams to the 24 team competition
and will quite frankly help CONCACAF take advantage of having the undivided
loyalty of one of the best football leagues in the world.
MLS can also take advantage of the situation by making Superliga meaningful
in cooperation with CONCACAF. While MLS surely does not want to give up two
spots in the CL, the confederation should put its foot down after MLS teams
won just two matches while losing eleven in the recently completed Champions
League. By contrast, USL-1 the second division in the United States had two
entrants that won eleven champions league matches between them. USL-1
deserves at the very least a chance to have its champions play into the
competition, but we’ll save that debate for another day.
Furthermore, MLS can foster closer ties with the FMF by potentially
expanding Superliga or even creating a SUM sponsored event that brings South
Americans best club sides to US soil to face Mexico’s best, since they will
no longer face off in the Libertadoras or Sudamericana. SUM has been
proactive and aggressive previously in taking advantage of the massive
fan base Mexican Football has in the United States.
The Swine Flu provides an opportunity for MLS and for CONCACAF. Now the
question is whether they will take it?
Contact us at editor@ontheroadin.com or editor@jaltembasol.com Submit pictures, articles and comments! |